Cullen and Australia are different worlds
Thursday May 10, 2007
Anybody thinking that Australian successive tax cuts would have opened up Finance Minister Michael Cullen's mindset would change their thinking.
Dr.Cullen defended Labour's social policy
priorities yesterday against attacks over his aversion to tax cuts
following a fifth consecutive tax-cutting Australian Budget.
Labour
is expected to cut the business tax rate from 33c to 30c as part of a
$1 billion business tax package in Dr Cullen's Budget next Thursday -
but that will be the first cut he has made to any tax rate in eight
Budgets.
National finance spokesman Bill English said Dr Cullen had wasted "a golden period" of low inflation and high surpluses.
"It
is never going to be as easy. The growth forecasts are now 2 1/2 per
cent instead of four and it is just harder to do it when the economy is
running low.
"Dr Cullen's record is eight years of missed opportunity."
Mr
English said Dr Cullen's failure to budget for tax cuts was a
significant factor in the different growth rates of the average wage in
New Zealand and Australia.
Dr Cullen pointed to union power in Australia having secured higher wages there.
"Until recently Australia had a much more heavily regulated labour
market than New Zealand's, which gave trade unions more bargaining
power."
Dr Cullen also said that the Labour Government's priorities lay in education, health and superannuation.
New
Zealand had a bigger catch-up job in terms of infrastructure spending,
and Australia also had lower levels of debt and debt servicing.
Dr
Cullen said Australia's tax cuts could well be inflationary and could
result in the Australian Reserve Bank having a stronger tightening bias
in monetary policy later in the year.
After the last Australian election, interest rates went up because of the pre-election Budget.
While
Dr Cullen has not cut any tax rates - and in fact raised the top rate
to 39c - he has hailed part of the Government's flagship Working for
Families policies as "tax relief".
He has changed depreciation
rates for business, foreshadowed adjustments to thresholds which still
have not taken effect, and made employer contributions to the KiwiSaver
scheme that starts in July tax-deductible.
There has been
pre-Budget speculation that Dr Cullen might make employee contributions
to the scheme tax-deductible, following comments by New Zealand First
leader Winston Peters that the Budget would provide a "bright light"
towards compulsory superannuation.
Mr Peters is due to make a
speech in Wellington today on that issue and on what he sees in the
need for change in monetary policy.
Mr English, meanwhile, has
said National does not support an inquiry by the finance and
expenditure committee on monetary policy after originally saying it
could be "useful."
"We won't support a futile talkfest."
He
thought it might work if the inquiry led to quick, effective policy
decisions to reduce pressure on interest rates and exporters.
Dr Cullen said he thought that "bitter Bill" would attempt to sabotage any attempt to find relief for exporters.
"He is determined not to have any kind of cross-party agreement."